Showing posts with label effective ethical problem solving.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label effective ethical problem solving.. Show all posts

Humble Leadership and Humanistic Leadership

 The Harvard Business Review had a nice article by Dan Cable about how Humble Leadership Really Works. I liked it so much I wanted to share it here.

https://hbr.org/2018/04/how-humble-leadership-really-works

It ties into something I have been thinking about lately. Something that my son asked about when he asked me how and why I was so confident.


I think humility is an important part of effective and ethical leadership. It is important to understand 

a) that you will make mistakes

b) the only thing worse than making a mistake is not fixing it, and 

c) you don't know what you don't know so it's wise to listen to others.

Many people think of humility as a sign of weekness, but it's actually an indication a hallmark of good leadership and management. 

Want to learn more - check out my online certificate programs: https://humanistlearning.com/category/businesscourses/professionaldevelopment/certificateprograms/

Humanism and Science

 I recently did a presentation for over 7,000 teachers in a global teaching forum.  One of the questions I was asked was - why do I consider science - a required skill?


The answer to that question lies in our commitment to effective & ethical problem solving.   

In order to solve problems, we have to be realistic about what is causing those problems. If we misdiagnose our problem - we will not only fail to solve our problem, we may actually make things worse.

Since - I want to make things better - I work on making sure what I think is true - actually is true. That is where science comes in.

Science is an attempt to objectively know things through systematic study. I am currently helping my son learn math. The most important part of learning math - is to be systematic about it. If you skip a step, you introduce error. The same is true for every field of study.

Systematic - works to reduce errors. Every time you can reduce errors - you increase your chance of success.

I don't think you can be a humanist if you are NOT committed to embracing science and critical thinking. You just can't. 

The problem is - science isn't always right. Mostly - they are just - less wrong.  Meaning - scientists are dedicated to learning what they are wrong about and learning how to be less wrong.  And that's great.

No one is perfect. Being humble enough to admit you might have been wrong and looking for ways to be less wrong - is what creates progress.  It's definitely better than the alternative - which is to just - always be wrong. Being less wrong - is actually right. 

Here is an essay I wrote on this - that discussing Isaac Asimov's approach to science - which is the relativity of wrong http://humanisthappiness.blogspot.com/2012/01/how-being-less-wrong-is-actually-right.html

What makes an inspirational leader and how someone can strive to be one?


I don’t think inspirational leaders strive to be inspirational. Instead – they are focused on solving important problems and the result is they inspire others. People who strive to be inspirational – tend to come off as – fake. Being inspirational is NOT a good goal. Solving important problems that impact real people – is a good goal. The people who do work hard to solve important problems- are the people we find inspiring. So don’t try to be inspirational – BE inspired and you will inspire others.

  
A reporter contacted me about inspirational leadership. Here are the questions they asked and my answers. 

What type of values do inspirational leaders have?

Inspirational leaders are aspirational people. They have personal dreams and goals they work towards. Those goals are almost always altruistically motivated. Meaning – they aren’t motivated by selfish things (like wealth or fame). They are instead motivated by their concern for others. And it is this that motivates them to work so hard to make things better for other people. What are the specific values?  Compassion is probably the core value. It’s hard to imagine anyone inspiring others if they are NOT fundamentally driven by their sense of compassion and personal responsibility. 

What skills do they possess?

They are strategic. It’s not enough to want to do good. In order to actually do good and succeed at doing good, you have to apply reason and critical thinking so that your actions have a positive impact. Wanting to do good – that is what compassion gives us. The desire to do good.  Strategic and critical thinking – help us to figure out what will actually work. This is what helps us – BE Good. 

What do they do and what don't they do?

They focus on fixing the problems. What they don’t do is worry about their reputation or status. They just focus on solving the problem with compassion and dignity. They don’t waste time on interpersonal pettiness.  They don’t waste time on things that look good, but don’t fix the problem.

The other thing they don’t do – is they don’t sacrifice their personal values in pursuit of solving the problem. They understand that HOW you solve your problem matters. If you hurt people to help people – you aren’t helping people. So they tend to be ethical, compassionate and dignified in all of their professional and personal relationships.  And it’s this last part that pushes them over the edge. Lots of people try to do big important things. But if you think of the people you find MOST inspirational – they are people who are caring, compassionate, loving, and dignified with EVERYONE they meet. They don’t reserve their concern for certain people. EVERYONE is treated well by them. Their personal and professional ethics – are the same and integrated. That makes them people – you want to be around and to work with and be inspired with.

It’s sad that most people are unable to be the caring compassionate ethical and dignified person we all aspire to be. Inspirational people – inspire us to be better – by being that truly good person we all aspire to.

Who do you consider to be an inspirational leader (not including yourself)?

Hillary Clinton. She is insanely competent, and always focused on helping others. From her work to help children get health care and to help change the way children are treated in the courts, through her entire life. It’s clear that compassion drives her and that she is super smart and super strategic and able to navigate and maintain her grace and dignity – even in the face of seriously horrible personal attacks. She has accomplished so much good in the world. My son has benefited from her work and I will be forever grateful to her for that. But she’s done all that under intense hatred directed towards her. And not once has she responded in kind.  She’s the sort of person – I aspire to be.

What do you think makes them stand out from the rest?

They fight and win – using reason and compassion. They don’t fight dirty. They win, not by fighting, but by refusing to back down.  They maintain their compassion and professionalism and patiently keep pushing for change – big and small. 

What about them captures your attention and do you think makes them inspirational?

For me – it’s how they maintain their grace and compassion and dignity and don’t resort to dirty tactics in pursuit of their goal.

What kind of impact does an inspirational leader make?

They change the world. By being a good, decent, hardworking compassionate individual, who doesn’t let setbacks prevent them from doing what they think is right, they provide an inspirational model for the rest of us to aspire to. 

What do you think are some goals of an inspirational leader?

To fix problems. It really is as simple as that.

Learn more: 

Take the online course - Principles of Humanistic Leadership - https://humanistlearning.com/principles-of-humanistic-leadership/


Empower Yourself

Empowerment is solving your problem - not waiting for someone else to solve it for you.

We all do it. We all take the lazy route. It is easier for us to wait for someone else to solve our problems, then to solve it ourselves. The problem is - our problems rarely get solved this way.

The other day, in an online group I'm part of, someone asked if anyone suffers from misophonia and how they deal with it. The woman in question has gotten to the point where she can't stand to hear her husband eat. She wanted to know if there was a way to get her husband to stop eating so loudly.

She was viewing her problem all wrong. She was putting the onus on solving her problem - on her husband - who honestly - wasn't doing anything wrong.  If she took responsibility to solve her problem, she might have been able to fix it  - without putting pressure on him.

First, lots of people have misophonia. For instance, I can't stand the sound of people eating gum near me. Especially if they are standing behind me. Drives me nuts. 

My mother also has misophonia. She couldn't stand the sound of my father eating.  Her solution?  Aircraft earmuffs. The type that are so heavy duty - they block out the sound of aircraft engines.  At mealtime, she would don her earmuffs and eat with the family - in peace.

Her solution was empowered. She solved her problem. She didn't wait for someone else to solve it. And this is especially important because - eating noises happen. If you can't stand them - take responsibility  - and use technology - to block out the offending noise.   THAT is what EMPOWERMENT is. Taking the power and responsibility - for yourself - and solving your problems - in a way that doesn't harm anyone else.

This is similar to the situation in the car - http://humanisthappiness.blogspot.com/2018/05/have-compassion-driving-edition.html   Have compassion. Make it your responsibility. Solve your problems in a way that don't cause problems for someone else. 

Racial Discrimination in "the trades"

I was recently asked by a manager in the construction trades: how to help their black employees become more effective and productive. This is a good concern to have. Unfortunately - the reason the manager was having such problems - despite having good intentions and actively recruiting for diversity - was because her understanding of what the problem was - was coming from a place of bias and privilege.

People talk a lot about bias and privilege and people bristle when they are told about it. All that is being said is that - there is a blind spot and you don't really understand the problem because - of the blind spot. I am sharing with you this example - so that you can see how bias and privilege create those blind spots so you can recognize them and fix them.

Please keep in mind that while this example specifically comes out of the construction trades, this sort of blind spot problem occurs in all industries. To create more diverse workforces, we have to start overcoming our biases - so that we can solve the problems preventing our teams from becoming truly diverse.

First - the problem: 


This manager said her company wants diversity and they actively hire for it. But every black person they have hired either quits, or gets fired. As I asked her to explain the problem she was having in more detail, she said that the black employees just aren't getting as much work done as their white counter parts and when this is pointed out and attempts made to increase productivity so that they can get the amount of work done that is expected  - reasonably so because white employees are able to meet these standards - that their black employees get angry - talk about racism and quit. Those that don't quit - end up getting fired because they simply aren't as productive as the company needs them to be. She came to me to find out how she could help the black employees learn how to be more to be more productive.

(If you are black and reading this - please take a deep breathe and let me handle this. In fact - this may be triggering - so proceed with caution. I am sharing this - because this person is well meaning - but ... her assumptions - were preventing a fix).

Here is how she worded her problem:

"So, we have a rather diverse workforce, but we still don't have very many African-Americans working for us. They don't tend to stay long, as, individually, they seem to not have the work ethic to do well. If something specific doesn't happen, they are often let go if there's a slow-down in work because they aren't working as hard. But I'm wondering if it's a defense mechanism. I know people make terrible decisions as defense mechanisms - "Oh, they're just going to (do something to let me down). Why bother?"  I need help articulating this idea that African Americans can be reached, if you understand their underlying behaviors as defense mechanisms, and that they possibly can be coached out of those behaviors, if you see their point of view. And not being willing to meet them in their space is part of systemic racism. But honestly, I don't know where to start.

The manager's understanding of the problem was flawed. From her perspective - the problem was that the black employees just weren't as productive and for some reason  - she had no idea why - they just didn't work as hard as their white counterparts, so - she wanted to help train them on things like conscientiousness and time management etc - to help them be more productive and less defensive when attempts were made to help correct productivity problems. (deep breathes).

The problem is - their decreased productivity isn't necessarily caused by the employee. It could very well be - a symptom of something else. And as long as she focused on increasing productivity without actually addressing that something else - the situation was never going to improve.

Why biases matter: 

We all have biases and those biases cause us to make assumptions about the nature of the problem.  In this case - she was making assumptions about her employees - that they just didn't know how to be productive or worse - that they didn't want to be productive.

The best way to overcome bias - is to ask questions. In this case, the best way to find out why people are leaving and not working to the expected standards – is to ask them.  But that requires a willingness to listen and adjust behavior to make space for the person who is choosing to leave instead of deal with whatever it is they don’t like.  Often, the fixes are insanely simple – because it has to do with giving and showing respect in a way that is meaningful for the person feeling aggrieved.

If someone isn’t respected, they often do the minimum work required – in a passive aggressive way. This may be what she was seeing. It may not be. The question is – if this is what you are seeing – why are you all triggering this response? How can you stop triggering this response?

To get past this – the hiring manager needs to understand their role in the communication problem and how to get past it.  The starting assumption should be: these people are willing to work and are capable of working to the required standards, but for some reason aren’t. Why? It’s entirely possible the reason they aren’t is because they feel disrespected in the workplace. If that’s the case, this is a harassment, discrimination and communication problem.  It also means – their behavior may be a result of them not feeling safe.

There is recent work on psychological safety and it’s impact on team performance. https://hbr.org/2017/08/high-performing-teams-need-psychological-safety-heres-how-to-create-it

The problem in using this information is – the resistance to using it. It is very easy for team leaders to say – the work I have to do to create safe workplaces for marginalized people isn’t worth the effort when I can get another employee who doesn’t require that extra work. This is a management failure where the management failure is rationalized to blame the marginalized people. Her instincts on this needing to be addressed is correct.

The person that needs to address it and who has to want to address it are the managers. They have to be willing to find out what is happening on site or wherever - because it may not be the manager creating the bad environment. It may be and probably is the people they are working with day to day. But until or unless there is a willingness to REALLY listen and learn with the goal of helping these people succeed and stay – nothing will change.

Another possibility:

Another possibility is this: We know women aren’t respected and their ability to be productive is negatively impacted by men withholding information and resources they need to get their work done. The example I’m thinking of is the guy who used his female employees email address and suddenly – customers who respond right away to him – were withholding and it was taking him A LOT longer to get the same amount of work done – because his clients weren’t as forthcoming with him because he was suddenly female. It’s entirely possible that the employees - who are being deamed - not productive – are working their asses off and not getting as much done because – the people who they are working with – are withholding from them and slowing them down. But again – you won’t know – until they are asked.

My manager friend was making assumptions about the motivations of her employees and why they weren't as productive as she hoped they would be. The result was - her focus was on fixing what she thought was the problem - and not what the employees understand the problem to be.

The only way to fix what is wrong – is to have honest – open conversations to find out what exactly the employees in question are experiencing and why they are experiencing it so that you can fix the problems or help them work around what they are experiencing so they can actually be productive despite the fact they may have hurdles that other - white employees don't have.

This is where privilege comes in. White employees don't have to deal with racist customers and vendors. Black and brown employees do.  Racism - impacts productivity. It's silly to pretend otherwise. If you want to change this dynamic - you have to make space for and protect your black and brown and female employees so that they can be productive - despite the racism and sexism.



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...