Scientific Literacy is a necessary life skill. It isn’t
optional anymore. To be an active citizen and to make sense of your health care
choices – you must be scientifically literate. So, a) what does it mean to be
scientifically literate and b) how does one become scientifically literally.
First – a definition: “Scientific literacy means that a
person can ask, find, or determine answers to questions derived from curiosity
about everyday experiences. It means that a person has the ability to describe,
explain, and predict natural phenomena. Scientific literacy entails being able
to read with understanding articles about science in the popular press and to
engage in social conversation about the validity of the conclusions. Scientific
literacy implies that a person can identify scientific issues underlying
national and local decisions and express positions that are scientifically and technologically
informed. A literate citizen should be able to evaluate the quality of
scientific information on the basis of its source and the methods used to
generate it. Scientific literacy also implies the capacity to pose and evaluate
arguments based on evidence and to apply conclusions from such arguments
appropriately. “(National Science Education Standards, page 22)
Or to put it more bluntly – a scientifically literate person
knows how to evaluate claims being made to know what is true and what is
false. This has wide ranging
implications for all aspects of life, from health care, to jobs, to politics
and more.
In many cases scientific literacy is a life and death matter
and it is not a joke to not know what is scientifically true and validated.
When people aren’t scientifically literate they make bad
decisions. Those bad decisions can
obviously cause personal harm and even death (see What’s the Harm for all the
ways people who don’t think scientifically harm themselves http://whatstheharm.net/)
Bad decisions taken by groups can have far ranging
consequences for the entirety of society. Pretty much every major civilization that
failed, failed because of bad decision making. For those of us who would like
to not only live, but live well – we view scientific literacy as the foundation
of all good decision making.
Deborah Howell – at the Washington Post – wrote an opinion
on – how to make sense of science reporting. Consider this your first lesson in
how to be skeptical of science reporting – and really all reporting. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/05/AR2008120502959.html
- Double check your sources.
- Always try to read the source material to make sure that the headline matches the actual findings
- Look for contradicting information
- Stick with facts and not with opinions.
Also available as a streaming video, audio book, dvd, ebook and paperback:
I'm a member of AAAS. Washington Post is the newspaper i dont get anymore (cant afford it and have no time to read it or place to put it and its a very mixed bag and always has been --plus i can get it free since people throw them away like they throw alot of stuff away including people). the billionaire who owns it doesn't need more money in my view.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.madinamerica.com that gives a different view than say Science magazine. i read both. i also have attended a unitarian or ethical society 'church' off and on since i was born. they don't have the answers either any more than science does).
Oooh - thanks for the link to the mad in america website. Going to review and see what i think.
Delete